Comments on: Cheap & easy website – wordpress http://socialwisdom.ca/2009/04/28/cheap-easy-website-wordpress/ Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:13:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Laurie Dillon Schalk http://socialwisdom.ca/2009/04/28/cheap-easy-website-wordpress/#comment-97 Laurie Dillon Schalk Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:36:41 +0000 http://cdnsocialwisdom.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-97 Excellent - I will look at both articles. I've been lax lately with the utter collapse of my notebook. Now I have to download all my tools again. Yes - I think I need to move to installing wordpress.org (or .com.. I forget which is which). The metrics would be so much better. Thanks. Excellent – I will look at both articles. I’ve been lax lately with the utter collapse of my notebook. Now I have to download all my tools again.
Yes – I think I need to move to installing wordpress.org (or .com.. I forget which is which). The metrics would be so much better. Thanks.

]]> By: daviding http://socialwisdom.ca/2009/04/28/cheap-easy-website-wordpress/#comment-93 daviding Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:34:48 +0000 http://cdnsocialwisdom.wordpress.com/?p=136#comment-93 It's been a while since I wrote <a href="http://coevolving.com/blogs/index.php/archive/the-why-and-how-of-establishing-your-web-persona/" rel="nofollow">The why and how of establishing your web persona</a>, but I think that it's compatible with your general directions. I thought that it was a big step up to <a href="http://coevolving.com/blogs/index.php/archive/installing-and-customizing-wordpress-on-your-own-domain/" rel="nofollow">Installing and customizing Wordpress on your own domain</a>, but still seem to get a lot of people reading that entry, so I guess it's still (mostly) valid. It’s been a while since I wrote The why and how of establishing your web persona, but I think that it’s compatible with your general directions.

I thought that it was a big step up to Installing and customizing WordPress on your own domain, but still seem to get a lot of people reading that entry, so I guess it’s still (mostly) valid.

]]>